Faculty of AgriSciences - list of publicationsHelp


The following list contains all information available to the publication.

VAVERKOVÁ, M D. -- ELBL, J. -- VOBĚRKOVÁ, S. -- KODA, E. -- ADAMCOVÁ, D. -- GUSIATIN, Z M. -- ANANBEH, H A A A. -- RADZIEMSKA, M. -- MAZUR, Z. Composting versus mechanical-biological treatment: Does it really make a difference in the final product parameters and maturity. Waste Management. 2020. v. 106, no. 1 April, p. 173--183. ISSN 0956-053X. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.030

Original name:
Composting versus mechanical-biological treatment: Does it really make a difference in the final product parameters and maturity
Czech name:
Written by (author):
Department:
Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology
Kind of publication:
article in a professional periodical
Periodical:
Waste Management
Nature of article:
paper
Volume no. (year):
106
Periodical number within the volume:
1 April
Year of publication:
2020
Starting page:
173
Up to page: 183
Number of pages:
11
Sub-specification:
článek je obsažen v databázi Web of Science
UT code by Web of Science:
EID code by Scopus:
Form of publication:
printed version
Original language:
English
Description in original language:
One of crucial waste management problems is the management of organic waste. This activity employs the composting. In case of green waste, its application seems reasonable, whereas the use of selected mixed waste raises problems related to the compost quality. Across countries, the non-sterile organic fraction of municipal solid waste is being separated through the mechanical-biological treatment. The technology is a solution of waste treatment and meets objectives set out in the Landfill Directive. There are many problems associated with the use of output products. The use of compost as a fertilizer requires determination of its impact on the environment. Compost quality can be assessed using analytical methods and phytotoxicity tests. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe changes in physico-chemical, enzymatic, phytotoxicity and vegetation parameters occurring in composts from two systems - a prismatic installation for green waste, and a mechanical-biological treatment installation. The compost from green waste exhibited greater stability. Values of dehydrogenase activity were lower if compared with the mechanically and biologically treated compost, which indicates lower compost maturity. The biomass production of Brassica napus L. and Fetuca rubra L. was higher in the variant with the application of green compost. The influence on Hordeum vulgare L., Cannabis sativa L., and Sinapis alba L. depended on the plant type and the compost used. Nevertheless, the compost from green waste was less toxic. The evidence from this study suggests that the mechanical-biological treatment had problems associated with the maturation and quality of the final product.
Description in English:
Description in Czech:
Year of submission:
2020
Year of transmission:
RIV identification number:
URL:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.030
 
Entry made by:
Last change:
03/27/2020 12:37 (Markéta Hejčová, DiS.)

Evaluation of publication:

123
4
5
        
1
2
3
45
bad
 
good
        
uninteresting
 
interesting
Assessed: 0
Average score: -
        Assessed: 0Average score: -
1
2
345
        
1
2
34
5
amateur
 
professional
        
theoretical
 
practical
Assessed: 0Average score: -
        
Assessed: 0
Average score: -


Source specification:

Waste Management. Oxford: ISSN 0956-053X.

Original name:
Waste Management
Czech name:
Written by (author):
Kind of publication: magazine
ISSN: 0956-053X
Country of publisher: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Place of publishing:
Oxford
Publisher:
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
URL:
Reviewed magazine:
no
Original language: English
Description in original language:
Description in English:
Description in Czech:
 
Entry made by:
Last change:
06/08/2017 07:52 (Šárka Novotná)

Evaluation of publication:

1
23
4
5
        
1
2
3
4
5
bad
 
good        
uninteresting
 
interesting
Assessed: 0
Average score: -
        Assessed: 0Average score: -
1
2
3
4
5
        
1
2
3
45
amateur
 
professional        
theoretical
 
practical
Assessed: 0
Average score: -
        
Assessed: 0
Average score: -